From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janis v. Com

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Dec 31, 1996
23 Va. App. 696 (Va. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Record No. 0271-95-2.

December 31, 1996.

Charles R. Watson, Colonial Heights, for appellants.

Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Before MOON, C.J., and BAKER, BENTON, COLEMAN, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, FITZPATRICK, ANNUNZIATA and OVERTON, JJ.


In Janis v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 646, 650-51, 472 S.E.2d 649, 651 (1996), a majority of a panel of the Court reversed and remanded the convictions of Kimberly O. Janis and Thomas Janis. A dissenting opinion was filed in the panel decision. The Commonwealth's petition for rehearing en banc was granted and heard on November 26, 1996. For the reasons stated in the panel's majority opinion, the convictions are reversed, the matters are remanded to the Circuit Court of Dinwiddie County and, accordingly, the stay of this Court's July 9, 1996 mandate is lifted.

Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Coleman and Fitzpatrick would affirm the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the original panel decision.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.


Summaries of

Janis v. Com

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Dec 31, 1996
23 Va. App. 696 (Va. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Janis v. Com

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY O. JANIS AND THOMAS JANIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Dec 31, 1996

Citations

23 Va. App. 696 (Va. Ct. App. 1996)
479 S.E.2d 534

Citing Cases

Moore v. Com

Ordinarily, a statutory violation does not require the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of that…

Adams v. Com

"The exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish the errors of judges and…