From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janangelo v. Falshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 1972
39 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

May 22, 1972


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 25, 1969, which denied their motion to amend their bill of particulars with respect to paragraph (a) of item 10 therein. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, motion granted and bill of particulars deemed amended as requested by plaintiffs. In our opinion, there was no showing of prejudice or surprise to defendant; and, in sound discretion, leave to amend should have been granted. Rabin, P.J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Janangelo v. Falshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 1972
39 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Janangelo v. Falshaw

Case Details

Full title:YOLANDA JANANGELO et al., Appellants, v. GEORGE T. FALSHAW, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 22, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Simone v. Long Island Jewish Hillside Medical Center

Plaintiffs now move this court for leave to serve an amended complaint containing a third cause of action…

Maloney v. Union Free School District No. 7

In deciding motions for leave to amend a bill of particulars the standard to be employed is akin to that…