From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 18, 1938
116 S.W.2d 401 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)

Opinion

No. 19649.

Delivered April 6, 1938. Rehearing denied May 18, 1938.

\ Appeal — Affirmance.

Where the indictment appeared regular, record was before appellate court without statement of facts or bills of exception, defendant had pleaded guilty to offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial, and no error was perceived, conviction was affirmed.

Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County. Hon. Henry King, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for burglary on a plea of guilty; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for four years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Eddie Roark and R. L. Wade, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of four years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this Court without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial.

No error having been perceived justifying a reversal, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.


It is our opinion that this cause was properly disposed of in our original opinion. We see no reason for changing our views herein.

The motion will be overruled.


Summaries of

James v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 18, 1938
116 S.W.2d 401 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
Case details for

James v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE JAMES v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 18, 1938

Citations

116 S.W.2d 401 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
116 S.W.2d 401

Citing Cases

Jeffers v. State

Then in a separate paragraph the court observed that no statement of facts was before it, apparently a remark…