From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. McCormack

U.S.
Jan 1, 1881
105 U.S. 265 (1881)

Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1881.

An appeal, dismissed under rule 16, will not be reinstated, unless good cause therefor be shown.

Mr. John Ambler Smith in support of the motion.

Mr. John W. Johnston and Mr. John A. Campbell, contra.


MOTION to reinstate an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia.


When the appellant was called and his appeal dismissed, the case had been nearly three years on the docket of this court. He had no brief on file, and was not present, either in person or by counsel. Under these circumstances the appellees were entitled, under Rule 16, to a dismissal. No notice of their intention to enforce the rule was necessary. The appellant has not excused himself for his default, and his case is clearly within that of Hurley v. Jones ( 97 U.S. 318), in which we announced our intention to enforce rigidly this salutary rule, and not to set aside defaults growing out of the neglect of counsel or parties, except for very good cause.

Motion denied.


Summaries of

James v. McCormack

U.S.
Jan 1, 1881
105 U.S. 265 (1881)
Case details for

James v. McCormack

Case Details

Full title:JAMES v . McCORMACK

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1881

Citations

105 U.S. 265 (1881)