From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 31, 2007
CV-05-1992 (BMC) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2007)

Summary

finding a showup unduly suggestive notwithstanding close temporal and spatial proximity

Summary of this case from Charles v. Artus

Opinion

CV-05-1992 (BMC).

October 31, 2007


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Go entered September 28, 2007 [docket 21]. No objections have been filed. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendations and dismisses the petition for the reasons set forth therein and ORDERS that the petition is dismissed and that no certificate of appealability will issue.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

James v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 31, 2007
CV-05-1992 (BMC) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2007)

finding a showup unduly suggestive notwithstanding close temporal and spatial proximity

Summary of this case from Charles v. Artus
Case details for

James v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JAMES, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT LUIS R. MARSHALL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Oct 31, 2007

Citations

CV-05-1992 (BMC) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Smith

A federal court evaluating a sufficiency of evidence claim "must look to state law to define the elements of…

LOPEZ v. LAPE

Turner, 262 F.3d at 123 (quotation marks and citation omitted).See Ellman v. Davis, 42 F.3d 144, 148 (2d Cir.…