From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Bank of Highland Park

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Apr 11, 1967
82 Ill. App. 2d 118 (Ill. App. Ct. 1967)

Summary

holding that violation of statute requiring removal of registration plates on the transfer of an automobile did not apply to a guarantor who did not have title or possession of automobile and that the failure to remove the plates did not proximately cause plaintiff's injury since negligence did nothing more than furnish condition by which injury was made possible

Summary of this case from Graham v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.

Opinion

Gen. No. 51,093. (Abstract of Decision.)

April 11, 1967.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, County Department, Law Division; the Hon. ALBERT E. HALLETT, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed.

William Parker Ward, of Chicago, for appellant.

Neil K. Quinn and Pretzel, Stouffer, Nolan Rooney, of Chicago (Joseph B. Lederleitner, of counsel), for appellee, Bank of Highland Park; Berger, Newmark Fenchel, of Chicago (Harry D. Lavery, of counsel), for appellee, Marvin Holland.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

James v. Bank of Highland Park

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Apr 11, 1967
82 Ill. App. 2d 118 (Ill. App. Ct. 1967)

holding that violation of statute requiring removal of registration plates on the transfer of an automobile did not apply to a guarantor who did not have title or possession of automobile and that the failure to remove the plates did not proximately cause plaintiff's injury since negligence did nothing more than furnish condition by which injury was made possible

Summary of this case from Graham v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.
Case details for

James v. Bank of Highland Park

Case Details

Full title:Robert H. James, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bank of Highland Park and Marvin…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division

Date published: Apr 11, 1967

Citations

82 Ill. App. 2d 118 (Ill. App. Ct. 1967)
226 N.E.2d 404

Citing Cases

Richards v. Leimbacher

• 1, 2 An appeal from an order dismissing a complaint for its failure to state a cause of action preserves…

Ray v. Cock Robin, Inc.

• 8 While we believe, as the Texas court specifically noted, that the "facts" and "circumstances" of the…