From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bourne v. Quarles & Brady, LLP

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 26, 2013
2013 WI App. 128 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2013AP211.

2013-09-26

James C. BOURNE and Madison Homes, Inc., Plaintiffs–Co–Appellants, v. QUARLES & BRADY, LLP and Donald K. Schott, Defendants–Respondents, Richard M. Burnham, Defendant–Appellant, Neider & Boucher, S.C., Melli Law, S.C. and Philip J. Bradbury, Defendants.

Despite this division, we discern some overlap between the two main sections. We make this point not to quibble with Bourne's briefing, but so that he understands why we take some of his arguments out of order and that we have made our best efforts to address what we perceive to be the substance of those arguments. 6 (Emphasis added.) 7



Summaries of

Bourne v. Quarles & Brady, LLP

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 26, 2013
2013 WI App. 128 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Bourne v. Quarles & Brady, LLP

Case Details

Full title:James C. BOURNE and Madison Homes, Inc., Plaintiffs–Co–Appellants, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

Citations

2013 WI App. 128 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
351 Wis. 2d 225
838 N.W.2d 866

Citing Cases

Raab v. Wendel

The statutory obligations have occasionally (although not universally) been referred to as "fiduciary…

Brookside Homes of Am., Inc. v. Helen's House, LLC

Collar cites to two cases from Wisconsin in which the courts held that the merger clauses in the contracts in…