holding that under Delaware law, a party may revoke his prior written consent
Summary of this case from ROAM-TEL PARTNERS v. ATT MOBILITY82-1648.
December 3, 1982.
Appeal from D.Del., Latchum, J.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
holding that under Delaware law, a party may revoke his prior written consent
Summary of this case from ROAM-TEL PARTNERS v. ATT MOBILITYFull title:Jacobs v. Pabst Brewing Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Dec 3, 1982
Finally, the defendants attack the validity of the entire Stefans proxy solicitation (as distinguished from…
United States v. BaileyAfter reaching that conclusion, the majority stated: In addition to the dissent authored by United States…