From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Wilkie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 20, 2020
CIVIL CASE NO. 4:19-CV-721 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2020)

Summary

taking judicial notice of EEOC documents attached to the defendants' motion to dismiss

Summary of this case from Badon v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 4:19-CV-721

08-20-2020

JAMES JACKSON v. ROBERT L. WILKIE, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, this matter having been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 21, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #72), was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be granted and Plaintiff be directed to file an amended complaint as to only the remaining claims.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's report should be adopted.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #40), is hereby GRANTED as follows:

• The head of the agency is the only proper defendant in an employment discrimination case; the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Defendant Wilkie, in his official capacity, is the only proper defendant to this cause;

• Plaintiff's Count One: The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") Disability Discrimination claim is hereby dismissed as to all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities;
• Plaintiff's Count Two: The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA") claim is hereby dismissed as to all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities;

• Plaintiff's Count Three: Reprisal claim is hereby dismissed as to the Individual Defendants and Defendant Wilkie in his individual capacity;

• Plaintiff's Count Four and Six: The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("RA") claim is hereby dismissed as to the Individual Defendants and Defendant Wilkie in his individual capacity;

• Plaintiff's Count Five: Hostile Work Environment claim is hereby dismissed as to the Individual Defendants and Defendant Wilkie in his individual capacity;

• Plaintiff's Count Six: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 claim is hereby dismissed as to all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities;

• Plaintiff's Count Seven: Weingarten Rights claim is hereby dismissed as to all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities;

• Plaintiff's Count Eight: The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 claim is hereby dismissed as to all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities;

• Plaintiff's Count Nine: The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 claim is hereby dismissed as to all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities; and

• Plaintiff's Count Ten: The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 claim is hereby dismissed as to all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is instructed to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this memorandum. Plaintiff shall replead those claims solely against Defendant Wilkie, in his official capacity, pertaining only to hostile work environment under the RA (Count 5), disability discrimination under the RA (Counts 4 and 6), and/or reprisal/retaliation under Title VII (Count 3). Should Plaintiff fail to replead the specified claims, this action will be dismissed as to all Defendants based on the instant Motion to Dismiss. If Plaintiff does replead, Defendant may move anew to dismiss, if Defendant has a basis to do so.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20th day of August, 2020.

/s/_________

SEAN D. JORDAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Wilkie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 20, 2020
CIVIL CASE NO. 4:19-CV-721 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2020)

taking judicial notice of EEOC documents attached to the defendants' motion to dismiss

Summary of this case from Badon v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.
Case details for

Jackson v. Wilkie

Case Details

Full title:JAMES JACKSON v. ROBERT L. WILKIE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 20, 2020

Citations

CIVIL CASE NO. 4:19-CV-721 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2020)

Citing Cases

Turner v. United States

The Fifth Circuit applies Title VII jurisprudence for disparate treatment claims under the Rehabilitation…

Longoria v. Via Metro. Transit

Courts in this circuit have taken judicial notice of EEOC documents. See Jackson v. Wilkie, No.…