Opinion
5:21-cv-231-TKW/MJF
06-08-2022
CRAIG A. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. GUILFORD, et al., Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MICHAEL J. FRANK, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Because Plaintiff has failed to pay the initial partial filing fee, failed to prosecute this action, and failed to comply with orders of the court, the undersigned respectfully recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
On January 24, 2022, the undersigned assessed an initial partial filing fee of $44.49. Doc. 6. The undersigned provided Plaintiff until April 14, 2022, to submit the initial partial filing fee and warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the order and pay the fee likely would result in dismissal of this case. Id.; Doc. 8. Plaintiff has not complied with the order and has not responded to the show cause order issued by the undersigned on May 3, 2022. Doc. 9.
Based on the foregoing, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that:
1. the District Court DISMISS this case without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with orders of this court, failure to prosecute, and failure to pay Page 1 of the initial partial filing fee; and
“Federal courts possess an inherent power to dismiss a complaint for failure to comply with a court order.” Foudy v. Indian River Cnty. Sheriff's Office, 845 F.3d 1117, 1126 (11th Cir. 2017) (citations omitted); Wilson v. Sargent, 313 F.3d 1315, 1320-21 (11th Cir. 2002) (noting that courts may dismiss a prisoner's case for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee after issuing an order to show cause); N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 41.1 (authorizing the court to dismiss an action, or any claim within it, “[i]f a party fails to comply with an applicable rule or a court order”).
2. the clerk of court be directed to close this case file.
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES
The district court referred this case to the undersigned to address preliminary matters and to make recommendations regarding dispositive matters. See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 72.2(C); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of the report and recommendation. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only and does not control. An objecting party must serve a copy of the objections on all other parties. A party who fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.