Opinion
Argued December 5, 1890
Decided January 14, 1891
Henry J. Sullivan for appellant.
George A. Benton for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for affirmance.
All concur, except BRADLEY and HAIGHT, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Jackson v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 14, 1891
26 N.E. 326 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Jackson v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 14, 1891
26 N.E. 326 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Jackson v. City of Rochester
Case Details
Full title:MICAJAH W. JACKSON, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 14, 1891
Citations
26 N.E. 326 (N.Y. 1891)
26 N.E. 326
Citing Cases
Ltown Ltd. Partnership v. Sire Plan, Inc.
At one time, New York had a statute which explicitly authorized the Court of Appeals, upon affirming a…