From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Cheatwood

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 1, 1969
445 S.W.2d 513 (Tex. 1969)

Opinion

No. B-1684.

October 1, 1969.

Appeal from the District Court, Harris County, John Snell, Jr., J.

Raymond H. Wilson, Houston, for petitioner.

Cattanach, Hughes, Carlisle Cralle, Robert A. Cattanach, Houston, for respondent.


The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment in this libel action, the proof establishing a qualified privilege of the defendant but standing silent as to the presence or absence of actual malice. On trial of the cause, it would be the burden of plaintiff to prove his allegation of actual malice. The Court of Civil Appeals has reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for trial, on the grounds that the defendant as movant had to negative the plaintiff's cause of action. 442 S.W.2d 789. Since the defendant, though enjoying a conditional privilege, would be liable if actuated by malice, it must fall to him to establish the absence of malice on his motion for summary judgment.

We approve this holding of the Court of Civil Appeals but since its opinion passes on matters not brought to this Court, the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Cheatwood

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 1, 1969
445 S.W.2d 513 (Tex. 1969)
Case details for

Jackson v. Cheatwood

Case Details

Full title:B. H. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Judy CHEATWOOD, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Oct 1, 1969

Citations

445 S.W.2d 513 (Tex. 1969)

Citing Cases

Zidan v. Zidan

Ahmed disagrees but concedes that in a motion for summary judgment, a party asserting a privilege that can be…

Wise v. Dallas Southwest Media

Five affidavits of council members were attached, each denying he made such a statement; none were filed…