Opinion
No. 025321/10 KI.
2014-02-26
Vincent JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ABRAMS, FENSTERMAN, FENSTERMAN, FLOWERS, GREENBERG & EISMAN, LLP, Defendant.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP
Civil Court, City of New York, Kings County.
Feb 26, 2014
42 Misc. 3d 1230 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2014)
Summaries of
Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP
Civil Court, City of New York, Kings County.
Feb 26, 2014
42 Misc. 3d 1230 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2014)
Case details for
Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP
Case Details
Full title:Vincent JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ABRAMS, FENSTERMAN, FENSTERMAN, FLOWERS…
Court:Civil Court, City of New York, Kings County.
Date published: Feb 26, 2014
Citations
42 Misc. 3d 1230 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2014)
988 N.Y.S.2d 523
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 50285
Citing Cases
Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP
See, Jackson v. Abrams, et al., 52 Misc.3d 183, 29 N.Y.S.3d 91 (Civil Ct., Kings Co.2016) (“Jackson II…
Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLPBy decision dated February 26, 2014, this Court denied defendant's original motion for summary judgment as…