From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J S v. Bowery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2007
39 A.D.3d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 715N.

April 24, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered February 14, 2006, which denied the motion of defendants Commercial Facades, also known as Commercial Facade Incorporated, and Miller Construction Co., Inc. to vacate an order of default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Peter B. Gierer, Hauppauge, for appellants.

Danzig Fishman Decea, White Plains (Thomas B. Decea of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.


Appellants claim, as a reasonable excuse for their nonappearance, that they never received any copy of the process in the action because their address on file with the Secretary of State was obsolete. However, the failure to file a change of address with the Secretary of State generally is not a reasonable excuse under CPLR 5015 (a) (1) ( Crespo v A.D.A. Mgt., 292 AD2d 5). While such a failure does not constitute a per se barrier to vacatur, and some flexibility may be allowed by the courts ( Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v AC Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 143), here flexibility is not warranted. At least three years passed during which the appellants' address on file with the Secretary of State was not updated, and appellants' principal, while denying that he had received the default order, acknowledged that it had been mailed to his home address ( see KPG Inc. v Salinas Group Ltd., 11 AD3d 338).


Summaries of

J S v. Bowery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2007
39 A.D.3d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

J S v. Bowery

Case Details

Full title:J S CONSTRUCTION OF NY, INC., Respondent, v. 321 Bowery LLC et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2007

Citations

39 A.D.3d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3565
835 N.Y.S.2d 65

Citing Cases

Viewtech v. Bomzer

The referee's determination, based largely on credibility ( see Ross v Garcia, 19 AD3d 261), that substituted…

Vengrenyuk v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the third-party defendant/second third-party defendant,…