From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ivie v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 7, 1974
205 S.E.2d 529 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

48965.

ARGUED JANUARY 14, 1974.

DECIDED MARCH 7, 1974.

Leaving scene of accident. Atlanta City Court. Before Judge Browne.

Don M. Jones, Richard J. Azar, Jr., for appellant.

Michael A. White, Solicitor, for appellee.


The defendant was convicted of leaving the scene of an accident. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and to serve twelve months, the twelve months to be suspended upon payment of the fine. Defendant appeals. Held:

A stipulation of facts properly authenticated discloses that defendant and another driver became involved in an altercation while driving motor vehicles on the expressway system of metropolitan Atlanta, and finally a collision between the two cars occurred, while the two drivers continued to shout at each other. Each driver contended the other driver drove his car into the other vehicle.

The evidence is conflicting as to which vehicle struck the other, but defendant admits he left the scene after shooting out the front tires of the other vehicle. Defendant contends he was in fear of bodily injury being inflicted upon him by the other driver, and that he shot the tires to prevent the other driver from following and catching up with the defendant. Code Ann. § 26-906 (Criminal Code of 1968, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1249, 1274) provides that one is not guilty of a crime if it is committed under such coercion that the defendant reasonably believes the performance of the act is the only way to prevent great bodily harm. See McCoy v. State, 78 Ga. 490 (1) ( 3 S.E. 768); Jones v. State, 207 Ga. 379 (2), 380 ( 62 S.E.2d 187); Perryman v. State, 63 Ga. App. 819 (4), 820 ( 12 S.E.2d 388).

The trial judge heard the evidence and found it sufficient to convict. The evidence clearly authorized the conviction and sentence. Guilt or innocence was a question for the fact finder (the judge in this instance). Rhodes v. State, 41 Ga. 215, 217; Adler v. Adler, 207 Ga. 394 (7) ( 61 S.E.2d 824); Hampton v. State, 102 Ga. App. 511 (1) ( 116 S.E.2d 649); Bragg v. State, 105 Ga. App. 442, 443 (3) ( 124 S.E.2d 645); Batson-Cook Co. v. R. C. Pierce c. Co., 124 Ga. App. 835, 836 ( 186 S.E.2d 358).

Judgment affirmed. Eberhardt, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 14, 1974 — DECIDED MARCH 7, 1974.


Summaries of

Ivie v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 7, 1974
205 S.E.2d 529 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Ivie v. State

Case Details

Full title:IVIE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 7, 1974

Citations

205 S.E.2d 529 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
205 S.E.2d 529