From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IULO v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Britain at New Britain
Feb 10, 2005
2005 Ct. Sup. 2113 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2005)

Opinion

No. CV-04-0524911-S

February 10, 2005


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION


Motion for Summary Judgment #124

In this lawsuit, the plaintiff's complaint alleges a breach of an employment contract. The defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that res judicata bars the plaintiff's claim because a judgment of nonsuit was entered in a prior suit for failure to comply with a court order.

A disciplinary nonsuit is not a judgment on the merits and, therefore, res judicata does not bar the plaintiff's claim. See Milgrim v. Deluca, 195 Conn. 191, 487 A. 2d 522 (1985); Rosenfield v. Cymbala, 43 Conn.App. 83, 89 n. 8, 681 A.2d 999 (1996); see also Linden Condominium Assn., Inc. v. McKenna, 247 Conn. 575, 594, 726 A.2d 502 (1999) (holding that res judicata "is an absolute bar to a subsequent action on the same claim" if it is rendered on the merits).

Therefore, the defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied.

Richard E. Burke, J.


Summaries of

IULO v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Britain at New Britain
Feb 10, 2005
2005 Ct. Sup. 2113 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2005)
Case details for

IULO v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD IULO v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL…

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Britain at New Britain

Date published: Feb 10, 2005

Citations

2005 Ct. Sup. 2113 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2005)