From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iuliano v. Romano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1996
225 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

affirming post-trial dismissal in slander of title action because of failure to prove special damages

Summary of this case from Chamilia, LLC v. Pandora Jewelry, LLC

Opinion

March 28, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lawrence Newmark, J.).


The trial court properly granted dismissal of the above mentioned claims since plaintiffs failed to submit sufficient evidence, inter alia, that defendant removed and cut trees, deposited debris onto plaintiffs' property, or caused flooding and erosion thereto. Moreover, plaintiffs failed to prove that defendant adversely affected plaintiffs' property to any extent beyond the natural consequences of the work defendant had contracted to perform for plaintiffs as part of the sale of the property from defendant to plaintiffs nor that defendant caused any harm other than inconvenience.

Plaintiffs also failed to prove that documents filed by defendant pertaining to an adjoining property owned by him, which contained a minor draftsman's error in the measurement of tie distances, was reasonably calculated to cause harm to plaintiffs, or that it resulted in any special damages sufficient to establish forth a prima facie claim for slander of title ( Carnival Co. v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 23 A.D.2d 75, 77).

We have considered plaintiffs' other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Iuliano v. Romano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1996
225 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

affirming post-trial dismissal in slander of title action because of failure to prove special damages

Summary of this case from Chamilia, LLC v. Pandora Jewelry, LLC
Case details for

Iuliano v. Romano

Case Details

Full title:RITA IULIANO et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT ROMANO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

Rosenbaum v. City of New York

Defendants' argument that a lien arose upon their advancement of funds to plaintiff's transferor has been…

Rosenbaum v. City of New York

Matter of Board of Educ. of Enlarged Ogdensburg City School Dist. [Wager Constr. Corp.], 37 NY2d 283;…