From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ithaca Trust Company v. Driscoll Brothers Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1917
220 N.Y. 617 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued January 25, 1917

Decided February 9, 1917

E.H. Bostwick for appellant.

Peter F. McAllister for respondent.


Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on stipulation, with costs in all courts, upon the ground that the trial justice erred in charging the jury, in effect, that they might find that the opening in the floor caused the intestate to fall by reason of dizziness or fear on his part; and in further charging that they could not find the defendant guilty of negligence unless the specific act of falling was caused in whole or in part by the opening in the floor; thereby withdrawing from the jury the question as to whether or not the opening caused, in whole or in part, the injuries to plaintiff's intestate, and the right to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in case it did contribute to those injuries; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and CRANE, JJ.


Summaries of

Ithaca Trust Company v. Driscoll Brothers Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1917
220 N.Y. 617 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Ithaca Trust Company v. Driscoll Brothers Company

Case Details

Full title:ITHACA TRUST COMPANY, as Executor of WILLIAM E. MARION, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 9, 1917

Citations

220 N.Y. 617 (N.Y. 1917)
115 N.E. 1041

Citing Cases

Rusin v. Jackson Hgts. Center

Something must project him into the hole but that something cannot be more than a concurrent cause of the…

Rusin v. Jackson Hgts. Shopping Center

As an illustration of the effect of a method of work on the owner's liability pursued by a subcontractor in a…