From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isom v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 30, 1976
335 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1976)

Opinion

No. 48665.

June 30, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Leon County; Charles D. McClure, Judge.

Edward L. Harvey, Asst. Public Defender; for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and A.S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Affirmed. Dirk v. State, 305 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1974). Cf. State v. Bryan, 290 So.2d 482 (Fla. 1974); Rigot v. Bucci, 245 So.2d 51 (Fla. 1971), Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

OVERTON, C.J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., dissents with an opinion.


I respectfully dissent. This case raises the constitutional validity of Section 832.05 (6), Florida Statutes (1975), the "bad check" statute which facilitates merchants' check collections by permitting criminal arrest and possible conviction based on mere presentment of a dishonored check and without any proof of a criminal intent. Justice Ervin thoroughly analyzed the due process infirmity of this provision in Dirk v. State, 305 So.2d 187, 188-190 (Fla. 1974) (dissent). His analysis was correct in 1974, and it is equally cogent now. Cf. Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975).


Summaries of

Isom v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 30, 1976
335 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1976)
Case details for

Isom v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK ISOM, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 30, 1976

Citations

335 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1976)