From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ismail v. Cnty. of Orange

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 23, 2012
Case No. SACV 10-00901 VBF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2012)

Summary

holding that "plaintiff's claims that the social worker defendants 'colluded' with other defendants or were part of a conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of her federal rights by facilitating A. I.'s adoption by the Fords" were precluded by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine because they were "nothing more than an indirect collateral attack on the state court orders and judgments in her dependency case."

Summary of this case from Thompson v. Santa Cruz Cnty. Human Servs. Dep't

Opinion

Case No. SACV 10-00901 VBF (AJW)

08-23-2012

NIVEEN ISMAIL, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge ("Report") and the objections to the Report. Good cause appearing, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ismail v. Cnty. of Orange

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 23, 2012
Case No. SACV 10-00901 VBF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2012)

holding that "plaintiff's claims that the social worker defendants 'colluded' with other defendants or were part of a conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of her federal rights by facilitating A. I.'s adoption by the Fords" were precluded by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine because they were "nothing more than an indirect collateral attack on the state court orders and judgments in her dependency case."

Summary of this case from Thompson v. Santa Cruz Cnty. Human Servs. Dep't
Case details for

Ismail v. Cnty. of Orange

Case Details

Full title:NIVEEN ISMAIL, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 23, 2012

Citations

Case No. SACV 10-00901 VBF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Santa Cruz Cnty. Human Servs. Dep't

Accordingly, pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the Court may not exercise jurisdiction over these…