From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irwin v. Irwin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 918 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided October 27th, 1926.

On appeal from a decree or order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Leaming, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 454.

Messrs. Endicott Endicott, for the respondent.

Mr. Lewis Starr, for the appellant.


The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Leaming.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Irwin v. Irwin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 918 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Irwin v. Irwin

Case Details

Full title:MABEL P. IRWIN, petitioner-respondent, v. RALSTON T. IRWIN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 27, 1926

Citations

134 A. 918 (N.J. 1926)
134 A. 918

Citing Cases

Parmly v. Parmly

This doctrine is embedded in our jurisprudence. Hires v. Hires, 91 N.J. Eq. 366; affirmed,92 N.J. Eq. 451;…

Baumgarten v. Baumgarten

In Calame v. Calame, 25 N.J. Eq. 548, the court of errors and appeals decided that the statute did not…