From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iridex Corp. v. Quantel Med., S.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2018
Case No. 18-cv-00153-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 18-cv-00153-SVK

01-16-2018

IRIDEX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. QUANTEL MEDICAL, S.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL EXHIBIT A TO COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 6

Before the Court is Plaintiff Iridex Corporation's ("Iridex") Administrative Motion to File Exhibit A to the Complaint Under Seal ("Motion"). Iridex seeks to seal certain business and financial information that is attached to its Complaint.

Courts recognize a "general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents." Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). A request to seal court records therefore starts with a "strong presumption in favor of access." Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The standard for overcoming the presumption of public access to court records depends on the purpose for which the records are filed with the court. A party seeking to seal court records relating to motions that are "more than tangentially related to the underlying cause of action" must demonstrate "compelling reasons" that support secrecy. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). For records attached to motions that re "not related, or only tangentially related, to the merits of the case," the lower "good cause" standard of Rule 26(c) applies. Id.; see also Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. A party moving to seal court records must also comply with the procedures established by Civil Local Rule 79-5.

Here, the "compelling reasons" standard applies because Exhibit A to the Complaint is a part of the pleadings on which this action is based. See In re NVIDIA Corp. Derivative Litig., No. 06-cv-06110-SBA, 2008 WL 1859067, at *3 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 23, 2008) (applying "compelling reasons" standard to request to seal complaint). Having considered the Motion, the Declaration of William E. Mosley in support thereof, the pleadings on file, the Court finds compelling reasons to seal Exhibit A. The Motion is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following materials should be sealed and that counsel for Iridex may file the following materials under seal:

Document

Text to be Sealed

Basis for Sealing Portion of Document

Ex. A to theComplaint

Entire Exhibit

Narrowly tailored to confidentialbusiness and financial information

SO ORDERED. Dated: January 16, 2018

/s/_________

SUSAN VAN KEULEN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Iridex Corp. v. Quantel Med., S.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2018
Case No. 18-cv-00153-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Iridex Corp. v. Quantel Med., S.A.

Case Details

Full title:IRIDEX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. QUANTEL MEDICAL, S.A., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2018

Citations

Case No. 18-cv-00153-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2018)