From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irabor v. Perry County Correctional Center

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Apr 30, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-0483-BH-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 30, 2008)

Summary

holding that a plaintiff had adequate state tort remedies available to redress the denial of "basic necessities such as socks, toilet paper, and soap"

Summary of this case from Pollard v. Geo Group, Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 06-0483-BH-C.

April 30, 2008


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 26) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Although petitioner's mail which contained the Report and Recommendation here at issue was returned as undeliverable (Doc. 27), petitioner is still deemed to have failed to object inasmuch as he has failed to fulfill his obligation to keep the Court informed of his proper address.


Summaries of

Irabor v. Perry County Correctional Center

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Apr 30, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-0483-BH-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 30, 2008)

holding that a plaintiff had adequate state tort remedies available to redress the denial of "basic necessities such as socks, toilet paper, and soap"

Summary of this case from Pollard v. Geo Group, Inc.
Case details for

Irabor v. Perry County Correctional Center

Case Details

Full title:NELSON A. IRABOR, Plaintiff, v. PERRY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 30, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 06-0483-BH-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Pollard v. Geo Group, Inc.

Nor is it apparent whether a prisoner could recover under state law for the denial of "basic necessities…