From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iodice v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 7, 1951
103 N.E.2d 348 (N.Y. 1951)

Opinion

Argued October 16, 1951

Decided December 7, 1951

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, LOUNSBERRY, P.J.

John P. Gualtieri and G. Edward La Gatta for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Henry S. Manley and Wendell P. Brown of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ. FROESSEL, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote for reversal for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion below ( 277 App. Div. 647, 654). Moreover, the evidence is uncontradicted that the natural flow of water was substantially increased by waters continuously diverted into the Delta Reservoir during July, August and through September 15, 1945, through the artificial Forestport feeder created and controlled by the State.


Summaries of

Iodice v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 7, 1951
103 N.E.2d 348 (N.Y. 1951)
Case details for

Iodice v. State

Case Details

Full title:GAETANO IODICE et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 7, 1951

Citations

103 N.E.2d 348 (N.Y. 1951)
103 N.E.2d 348

Citing Cases

Baldwin c. Co. v. Georgia Power Co.

We think that a reading of these approved charges clearly indicates that there is no duty on the part of the…

Stormes v. United Water New York

The Supreme Court denied the defendants' motion on the ground that a triable issue of fact had been raised by…