holding speech does not generally touch on matter of public concern, as that requirement has been interpreted, where its aim is to air or remedy grievances purely of a personal nature
Summary of this case from Pratt v. OttumNo. 97-70.
October 6, 1997.
Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 148 N. J. 561, 691 A. 2d 339.
holding speech does not generally touch on matter of public concern, as that requirement has been interpreted, where its aim is to air or remedy grievances purely of a personal nature
Summary of this case from Pratt v. Ottumfinding that owner can do anything with trade mark if he wants, including attaching it to goods of poor quality or different types of goods
Summary of this case from Coyne's Company, Inc. v. Enesco, LLCtaking jurisdiction to construe a bi-state compact
Summary of this case from Unalachtigo Band of Nanticoke v. StateFull title:INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE CO. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF OPERATING…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 6, 1997
We start our analysis recognizing that the courts of this State have always embraced the principle that…
Velez v. Wilkerson ElectricalTHE PUBLIC WORKS BOND ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. "The Bond Act has existed in various forms for almost eighty…