Opinion
Nos. 07-6242, 09-6889.
Submitted: September 8, 2009.
Decided: October 7, 2009.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00585-H).
Charles A. Inko-Tariah, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles A. Inko-Tariah appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and North Carolina's Handicapped Persons Protection Act, N.C.G.S. § 168A-1, et seq. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Inko-Tariah v. Lappin, No. 5:05-ct-00585-H (E.D.N.C. filed Apr. 6, 2006 entered Apr. 10, 2006; Jan. 30, 2007; Apr. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.