From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingle v. Armour Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 2, 1933
250 N.W. 312 (Mich. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 80, Calendar No. 36,865.

Submitted June 14, 1933.

Decided October 2, 1933. Rehearing denied December 6, 1933.

Appeal from Wayne; Lamb (Fred S.), J., presiding. Submitted June 14, 1933. (Docket No. 80, Calendar No. 36,865.) Decided October 2, 1933. Rehearing denied December 6, 1933.

William A. Ingle presented to the circuit court certified copies of proceedings under workmen's compensation act against Armour Company, employer, and Western Casualty Company, insurer. Judgment for plaintiff. From order vacating judgment, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

George D. O'Brien, for plaintiff.

Kerr, Lacey Scroggie, for defendants.


October 28, 1927, plaintiff, while in the employ of defendant Armour Company, received a compensable injury, and, by agreement, he was to be paid $18 per week during total disability. He was paid $579, and, June 9, 1928, resumed his employment and was paid his previous wage of $30 per week until September 21, 1929, when he voluntarily quit. June 27, 1928, plaintiff executed a final settlement receipt which was filed with the department but no approval thereof sought or had at that time. In November, 1931, plaintiff filed with the department of labor and industry a petition for further compensation, and, upon hearing before a deputy commissioner, it was, on January 4, 1932, determined and adjudged that he was not entitled to further compensation. No appeal was taken.

In February, 1932, plaintiff procured from the secretary of the department copies of the record, inclusive of the holding: "There is no compensation due to the plaintiff on the date hereof."

March 12, 1932, plaintiff took judgment in the circuit court on the agreement for compensation, for the sum of $3,381, making no deduction for the sum paid him for work and labor from June 9, 1928, to September 1, 1929. Upon learning of the judgment defendants moved to set it aside, and, on July 1, 1932, the court set the judgment aside. Plaintiff reviews by appeal.

The facts as stated commanded vacation of the judgment. See Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. Pneff, 262 Mich. 116.

Affirmed, with costs to defendants.

McDONALD, C.J., and POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, FEAD, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. CLARK, J., took no part in this decision.


Summaries of

Ingle v. Armour Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 2, 1933
250 N.W. 312 (Mich. 1933)
Case details for

Ingle v. Armour Co.

Case Details

Full title:INGLE v. ARMOUR CO

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 2, 1933

Citations

250 N.W. 312 (Mich. 1933)
250 N.W. 312

Citing Cases

Hughson v. City of Kalamazoo

Such agreement, the order of approval by the department, and the award based thereon may possibly be…

Holmes v. State Ind. Acc. Com

Such agreement, the order of approval by the department, and the award based thereon may possibly be…