From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingersoll v. South Orange

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 29, 1925
102 N.J.L. 218 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Submitted May 29, 1925 —

Decided September 29, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 335.

For the appellants, Riker Riker.

For the respondent, Howe Davis.


The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Ingersoll v. South Orange

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 29, 1925
102 N.J.L. 218 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Ingersoll v. South Orange

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. INGERSOLL, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 29, 1925

Citations

102 N.J.L. 218 (N.J. 1925)
130 A. 918

Citing Cases

Leary v. Adams

A municipality in Alabama cannot prohibit the construction and use of a structurally proper building for a…

Youngstown v. Kahn Bldg. Co.

The discrimination which is thereby made between the district of the wealthy and the district of the poor can…