From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Indiero v. Indiero

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division
Sep 14, 1971
116 N.J. Super. 193 (Ch. Div. 1971)

Opinion

Tried September 14, 1971 —

Decided September 14, 1971.

Messrs. Cass Cass, attorneys for plaintiff ( Ms. Rosemary Cass, appearing).

Mr. Charles Kurebanas, attorney for defendant.


At final hearing of contested causes of action for divorce grounded in causes based on fault under the Divorce Act before its recent amendment, both sides moved to amend their respective claims to assert a new cause of action, each seeking a divorce against the other, based on the new 18-month separation ground under the act as recently amended.

Under N.J.S. 2A:34-2, as amended, divorces may now be granted for the old causes of action as well as the newly added causes of action "heretofore or hereafter arising." The amended act became effective September 13, 1971. There is no dispute in this case that the parties have not lived together since July 5, 1969.

This section of the statute should be construed as operating retroactively. In the present situation each party has a right to assert a claim for a cause of action which has arisen since the filing of the respective complaint and counterclaim, but which could not have been asserted until the effective date of the amended statute. I will grant plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint by way of supplement to add the additional ground and to be heard on it. I will also grant defendant's motion to amend his counterclaim in like fashion to set out an additional ground.


Summaries of

Indiero v. Indiero

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division
Sep 14, 1971
116 N.J. Super. 193 (Ch. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Indiero v. Indiero

Case Details

Full title:HELANA INDIERO, PLAINTIFF, v. RALPH INDIERO, DEFENDANT

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division

Date published: Sep 14, 1971

Citations

116 N.J. Super. 193 (Ch. Div. 1971)
281 A.2d 400

Citing Cases

Sadeeshkumar v. Venugopal

There is no precedent applying Rule 5:4-2(e) in the manner suggested by plaintiff. Existing precedent has…

Quinn v. Quinn

The trial judge's traditionally broad discretion in matrimonial cases is recognized in New Jersey. X v. Y,…