From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Indiero v. Fausto

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 19, 1941
21 A.2d 736 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Argued May 22, 1941 —

Decided September 19, 1941.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 126 N.J.L. 219.

For the respondents, Feder Rinzler.

For the appellant, Benjamin M. Ratner.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Indiero v. Fausto

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 19, 1941
21 A.2d 736 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Indiero v. Fausto

Case Details

Full title:ROSE INDIERO, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. ANTONIO FAUSTO…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 19, 1941

Citations

21 A.2d 736 (N.J. 1941)
21 A.2d 736

Citing Cases

Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.

of contributory negligence. Benton v. Y.M.C.A. of Westfield, supra (27 N.J. at page 70); Hartman v. City of…