Summary
In Indiana v. Ahmad Edwards, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 741, 169 L.Ed.2d 579, (2007), a case recently argued before the United States Supreme, but still undecided, the parties suggest that Faretta and its progeny, has resulted in a lack of clarity in the trial courts.
Summary of this case from State v. CampbellOpinion
No. 07–208.
2007-12-7
INDIANA, petitioner, v. Ahmad EDWARDS.
Case below, 866 N.E.2d 252.
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana granted limited to the following question: “May States adopt a higher standard for measuring competency to represent oneself at trial than for measuring competency to stand trial?”.