From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Independent Union v. Pan Am. World Airways

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 8, 1988
836 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1988)

Summary

holding that dispute between Pan Am World and union over application of Pan Am World's CBA to recently acquired sister airline must be dismissed because NMB has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether airlines should be treated as a single carrier

Summary of this case from Ford v. Air Line Pilots Association International

Opinion

No. 435, Docket 87-7680.

Argued January 7, 1988.

Decided January 8, 1988.

George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C. (Mady Gilson, Deborah C. Malamud, Bredhoff Kaiser, Washington, D.C.; Seymore M. Waldman, Patricia McConnell, Valdeck, Waldman, Elias Englehard, P.C., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard Schoolman, New York City, for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, WINTER and ALTIMARI, Circuit Judges.


We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. 664 F.Supp. 156 (S.D.N.Y. 1987).

We add one brief comment. Subsequent to the decision of the district court, the appellant, the Independent Union of Flight Attendants ("IUFA"), petitioned the National Mediation Board for an election to determine whether it might represent Pan Am Express's flight attendants. The Mediation Board determined that such an election should be held. IUGA received a majority of votes in that election, and now represents those flight attendants. We believe that these events underscore the correctness of the district court's decision that representation issues within the jurisdiction of the Mediation Board are implicated in the instant matter. IUFA has argued before us that the decision of the Mediation Board does not resolve the underlying issues because a contract addressing the question of work assignments must now be negotiated between Pan American Express, Inc. and IUFA. That may well be the case, but it merely demonstrates that the issue of whether the former Ransome employees may bargain as a unit or are to be represented by the larger unit is a paradigmatic representation issue subject to resolution by the National Mediation Board.


Summaries of

Independent Union v. Pan Am. World Airways

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 8, 1988
836 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1988)

holding that dispute between Pan Am World and union over application of Pan Am World's CBA to recently acquired sister airline must be dismissed because NMB has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether airlines should be treated as a single carrier

Summary of this case from Ford v. Air Line Pilots Association International

affirming dismissal of complaint for lack of jurisdiction because "the issue of whether the former Ransome employees may bargain as a unit or are to be represented by the larger unit is a paradigmatic representation issue subject to resolution by the National Mediation Board"

Summary of this case from Association of Flight Attendants-Cwa v. Delta Air Lines
Case details for

Independent Union v. Pan Am. World Airways

Case Details

Full title:INDEPENDENT UNION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 8, 1988

Citations

836 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

Flight Eng. Intern. v. Pan Am. Airways

FEIA, in turn, filed this action. Following the decision of a similar case, IUFA v. Pan American World…

Southern Ry. Co. v. American Train Dispatchers

" Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Railway Labor Executives' Association, 491 U.S. 299, 305, 109 S.Ct. 2477, 2481,…