From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ross v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 2002
297 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-02497, 2001-02499, 2001-09620

Submitted April 30, 2002.

August 5, 2002.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Bannon, H.E.), entered November 15, 1999, which awarded the mother $5,749 in child support arrears, (2) so much of an order of the same court (Bannon, H.E.), also entered November 15, 1999, as dismissed his cross petition for a downward modification of his maintenance and child support obligations, and (3) an order of the same court (Brennan, J.), entered February 1, 2001, which denied his objections to those orders.

Warren S. Landau, Cedarhurst, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles S. Sherman, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., NANCY E. SMITH, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeals from the orders entered November 15, 1999, are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeals lie therefrom (see Family Ct Act § 439[e]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order entered February 1, 2001 is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father's cross petition sought a downward modification of his support obligations under a judgment of divorce which is subject to the terms of a separation agreement that was incorporated but not merged into the judgment. Under such circumstances, the father must demonstrate "extreme hardship" (Matter of Cohen v. Seletsky, 142 A.D.2d 111, 112; see Domestic Relations Law § 236B[9][b]). The Family Court properly determined that the father failed to do so (see Clark v. Clark, 280 A.D.2d 575; Mishrick v. Mishrick, 251 A.D.2d 558).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., SMITH, FRIEDMANN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ross v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 2002
297 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ross v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CHERYL I. ROSS, respondent, v. DAVID M. ROSS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 5, 2002

Citations

297 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

Withers v. Withers

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the mother. The father failed to present credible proof that…

Norman v. Dykman

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate…