From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Robinson v. McKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 2002
293 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-02230

Argued February 25, 2002.

April 1, 2002.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated February 14, 2000, which, after a hearing, awarded custody of the child to the paternal grandmother and awarded the mother supervised visitation.

Helene Chowes, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Bernstein Jaffe, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Kenneth Jaffe of counsel), for respondent.

Carol Sherman, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Barbara H. Dildine of counsel), Law Guardian for the child.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA L. TOWNES, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"A * * * parent may not be deprived of custody of his or her child absent `surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness or other like extraordinary circumstances'" (Matter of Carosi v. Bloom, 225 A.D.2d 692 quoting Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 544). Where extraordinary circumstances have been established, the court must inquire into the best interests of the child before making the custody determination (see Matter of Odums v. Metcalf, 276 A.D.2d 794, 795).

Contrary to the mother's contention, there was sufficient evidence to establish that extraordinary circumstances existed (see Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, supra). Having found the existence of extraordinary circumstances, the Family Court properly determined that the best interests of the child would be served by awarding custody to the paternal grandmother (see, Matter of Odums v. Metcalf, supra).

The Family Court's determination that the mother's visitation with the child should be supervised has a sound and substantial basis in the record and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Minas v. Shevlin, 254 A.D.2d 420, 421).

O'BRIEN, J.P., LUCIANO, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Robinson v. McKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 2002
293 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Robinson v. McKenzie

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF LESLEY ROBINSON, respondent, v. QUEEN McKENZIE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 643

Citing Cases

Solomon v. Lee

Moreover, the court-appointed forensic psychologist concluded, after performing an evaluation of the parties,…

In the Matter of Pope v. Pope

Here, there was ample evidence in the record to support the Family Court's award of custody to the father.…