From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Nieves v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 24, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93866.

Decided and Entered: December 24, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Orlando Nieves, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit the unauthorized possession of money and possession of drugs. The charges stem from the discovery of $160, cocaine and heroin hidden inside a pilaster which was accessible from inside petitioner's cell.

A pilaster is a column-type framework that houses the cell's gate or locking mechanism, which, although outside the cell, is accessible from within the cell.

Notwithstanding the fact that other inmates had access to the area where the contraband was found, the fact that the contraband was found in an area within petitioner's control gives rise to a reasonable inference of possession (see Matter of Johnson v. Racette, 282 A.D.2d 899; Matter of Fernandez v. Stinson, 251 A.D.2d 887). This inference, together with the misbehavior report and supporting documentation, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fugate v. Goord, 277 A.D.2d 626). Furthermore, our review of the record fails to support petitioner's claim of hearing officer bias or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Thomas v. Selsky, 256 A.D.2d 712). Petitioner's remaining contention, that he was denied the right to observe the search of his cell, has been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Nieves v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 24, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Nieves v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ORLANDO NIEVES, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 24, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 711

Citing Cases

Vento v. Goord

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges and the determination was…

Turner v. Fischer

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the…