From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Daniels v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 2002
293 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-06482

Submitted March 25, 2002.

April 22, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of John A. Johnson, Commissioner of State of New York Office of Children and Family Services, dated May 19, 2000, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner had committed an act of maltreatment of her son and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to child care employment.

Wolfson Grossman, Westbury, N.Y. (Mary T. Lucere of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent John A. Johnson, Commissioner of New York State Office of Children and Family Services.

Lorna B. Goodman, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Maureen A. Gest of counsel), for respondent Robert Sherman, Commissioner of Nassau County Department of Social Services.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the determination is annulled.

The record lacks substantial evidence to support the determination.

S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Daniels v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 2002
293 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Daniels v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF YOLANDA DANIELS, appellant, v. JOHN A. JOHNSON, ETC., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 632

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Care v. Wing

In reviewing a determination of an administrative agency made after a hearing, this court's review is limited…