From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Yates

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 26, 2012
212 N.J. 188 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-26

In the Matter of Mark G. YATES, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 022361980).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–003, concluding that MARK G. YATES of FLEMINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And MARK G. YATES having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a three-month suspension from practice of law is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK G. YATES is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, and until the further Order of the Court, effective October 26, 2012; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20–20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20–20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20–20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10–2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Yates

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 26, 2012
212 N.J. 188 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Yates

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mark G. YATES, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

212 N.J. 188 (N.J. 2012)
52 A.3d 170

Citing Cases

In re Morin

(b) and (c) also found); In re Brollesy, 217 N.J. 307 (2014) (three-month suspension for attorney who misled…

In re McElroy

See, e.g., In re Brollesy, 217 N.J. 307 (2014) (three-month suspension imposed on attorney who misled his…