From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Williamson Construction

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Sep 18, 2006
No. 13-06-440-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 18, 2006)

Opinion

No. 13-06-440-CV

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed September 18, 2006.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Justices YAÑEZ, RODRIGUEZ and GARZA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator, Joe Williamson Construction Company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on August 4, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus with appendix, the response filed by real party in interest Raymondville Independent School District, and relator's reply to the response is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon Supp. 2006) (providing that an appeal can be taken from an interlocutory order of a district court that grants a temporary injunction). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a).

Furthermore, on August 4, 2006, this Court granted relator's motion to stay the trial court's order of July 17, 2006, setting the trial "on the 6th of Sept. 2006 at 9 o'clock a[.]m. with announcements on Aug. 31, 2006 at 9 o'clock a[.]m," in cause number C-738-06-C in Hidalgo County. Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.


Summaries of

In re Williamson Construction

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Sep 18, 2006
No. 13-06-440-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 18, 2006)
Case details for

In re Williamson Construction

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JOE WILLIAMSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

Citations

No. 13-06-440-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 18, 2006)

Citing Cases

Williamson v. Raymondville

We have taken judicial notice of our files from the related mandamus proceeding. See In re: Joe Williamson…