From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Will of Barnes

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2004
358 N.C. 143 (N.C. 2004)

Opinion

No. 262A03

Filed 5 March 2004

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 157 N.C. App. 144, 579 S.E.2d 585 (2003), finding no error in part and vacating in part a judgment signed 9 March 2001 by Judge John B. Lewis, Jr., in Superior Court, Edgecombe County (File No. 01-SP-15). On 16 March 2001, Judge Lewis signed an order entered in Superior Court, Edgecombe County, transferring the case back to Superior Court, Martin County (File No. 98-SP-58). Heard in the Supreme Court 16 February 2004.

Bass, Bryant Fanney, by John Walter Bryant and Eva C. Currin; and Batts, Batts Bell, LLP, by Jeffrey A. Batts, Joseph L. Bell, Jr., and Wendy P. Wilson, for propounder-appellee; Poyner Spruill, LLP, by Gregory S. Camp, for propounder-appellee Church of the Advent. Gaylord, McNally, Strickland, Snyder Holscher, L.L.P., by Danny D. McNally and Emma S. Holscher, for intestate-appellant Riley S. Corddry; Emanuel Dunn, by Stephen A. Dunn; and Dunn and Dunn, by Raymond E. Dunn, Jr., for intestate-appellant Lucy Tull; and Browning Hill, L.L.P., by Myron T. Hill, Jr., for intestate-appellant Diane Barnes Graue. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Charles J. Murray, Special Deputy Attorney General, for other-appellant East Carolina University Athletic Fund. The Blount Law Firm, P.A., by Marvin Blount, Jr., Ted Mackall, Jr., and Rebecca Cameron Blount, for caveator-appellants.


For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

In re Will of Barnes

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2004
358 N.C. 143 (N.C. 2004)
Case details for

In re Will of Barnes

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE PURPORTED LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF FRANCIS M…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 2004

Citations

358 N.C. 143 (N.C. 2004)
592 S.E.2d 688

Citing Cases

State v. Ward

We have recognized the discretion of trial courts to conduct bifurcated proceedings, or the propriety of that…

State v. Armstrong

’ “ State v. Daniels,––– N.C.App. ––––, ––––, 741 S.E.2d 354, 362 (2012) (quoting State v. Barker,138…