From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Victorick

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 6, 2013
NO. 09-13-00483-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 09-13-00483-CR

11-06-2013

IN RE DAVID LEE VICTORICK


Original Proceeding


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator David Lee Victorick filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court. In three issues, Victorick complains that the presiding judge of the Second Administrative Judicial Region denied his motion to recuse the trial judge.

On the record before us, we conclude that we lack mandamus authority over the presiding judge's denial of the motion to recuse the trial judge. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); In re ES Energy Solutions, LP, No. 05-10-01158-CV, 2010 WL 3720219, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 24, 2010, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Davidson, No. 09-07-380 CV, 2007 WL 2324321, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 16, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we dismiss Victorick's petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Victorick

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 6, 2013
NO. 09-13-00483-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2013)
Case details for

In re Victorick

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DAVID LEE VICTORICK

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 6, 2013

Citations

NO. 09-13-00483-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Victorick v. State (Ex Parte Victorick)

We have considered three related matters filed by Victorick. Initially, we dismissed a petition for a writ of…

Victorick v. State

We have considered three related matters filed by Victorick. Initially, we dismissed a petition for a writ of…