From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Trinity Innovative Enterprises, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 27, 2010
Case No. 09-20579REF, Adversary No. 10-2089 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 09-20579REF, Adversary No. 10-2089.

December 27, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27 day of December, 2010, upon my consideration of the Motion of Defendants DirectBuy, Inc., f/k/a UCC Totalhome, Inc., and Beta Finance Company, Inc., To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (the "Motion To Dismiss"), and upon the briefs filed by the parties, and based upon the findings, conclusions, and discussion set forth in my Statement Supporting Order Dated December 27, 2010, Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (the "Statement"),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion To Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Trustee is HEREBY GRANTED leave to amend her Complaint on or before January 24, 2011, to cure the deficiencies noted in the Statement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Trustee fails to amend her Complaint by January 24, 2011, Defendants shall file their answer to the portions of the Complaint that have not been dismissed by this Order on or before January 31, 2011.


Summaries of

In re Trinity Innovative Enterprises, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 27, 2010
Case No. 09-20579REF, Adversary No. 10-2089 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2010)
Case details for

In re Trinity Innovative Enterprises, LLC

Case Details

Full title:In re: TRINITY INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISES, LLC, Chapter 7, Debtor, MARY…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 27, 2010

Citations

Case No. 09-20579REF, Adversary No. 10-2089 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Kuyper

" (Filing 35 at 5, ¶ 14) Setoff "is an affirmative defense that cannot be raised on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion…