From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Terrell

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 12, 2013
214 N.J. 44 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-12

In the Matter of Sharon S. TERRELL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 006691986).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–367, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent), that SHARON S. TERRELL of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since October 27, 2010, should be censured for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SHARON S. TERRELL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the temporary suspension of respondent, entered by Order of this Court filed October 27, 2010, shall continue pending the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of her suspension, and that she shall comply with Rule 1:20–20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Terrell

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 12, 2013
214 N.J. 44 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Terrell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Sharon S. TERRELL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

214 N.J. 44 (N.J. 2013)
66 A.3d 1292

Citing Cases

In re Boyman

The attorney's disciplinary history consisted of a public reprimand, a private reprimand, and a three-month…

In re Vreel

The attorney's disciplinary history consisted of a public reprimand, a private reprimand, and a three-month…