From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tatnall

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 918 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Decided May 20th, 1929.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Curry Purnell, for the appellants.

Mr. Morris Bloom, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 102 N.J. Eq. 445. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — PARKER, LLOYD, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

In re Tatnall

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 918 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

In re Tatnall

Case Details

Full title:In the matter of the application on behalf of CORNELIA CORLIES EARNSHAW…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 20, 1929

Citations

146 A. 918 (N.J. 1929)
146 A. 918

Citing Cases

Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk

The parties agree that under this provision the buyer could elect either to perform or to pay the deposit of…

State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.

It has been recognized, usually in direct actions between the parties to an agreement, that if the payment or…