From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIAB. LIT.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 19, 2002
No. 1:01-CV-9000 (MDL Docket No. 1401) (N.D. Ohio Jun. 19, 2002)

Opinion

No. 1:01-CV-9000 (MDL Docket No. 1401)

June 19, 2002


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The parties in this case filed a proposed class action settlement agreement on March 13, 2002, and later filed five separate amendments to the proposed agreement. In separate rulings, the Court approved the agreement and each amendment. Nowhere on the docket, however, is a copy of a single document that comprises the agreement as amended. Accordingly, for the purpose of making the record clear, the Court attaches to this Order a "composite" copy of the settlement agreement, as amended. To the extent this composite document does not accurately reflect the original separate agreement and amendments, however, the original documents are controlling.


Summaries of

IN RE SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIAB. LIT.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 19, 2002
No. 1:01-CV-9000 (MDL Docket No. 1401) (N.D. Ohio Jun. 19, 2002)
Case details for

IN RE SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIAB. LIT.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 19, 2002

Citations

No. 1:01-CV-9000 (MDL Docket No. 1401) (N.D. Ohio Jun. 19, 2002)

Citing Cases

In re Diet Drugs (Phendermine, Fenfluramine)

Liab. Litig., 246 F.3d 315, 327 n. 11 (3d Cir. 2001); In re Sulzer Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Liab.…