From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Suffolk County Child Protective Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2011
84 A.D.3d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 2010-08281 (Docket Nos. NN-10804-09, NN-10805-09).

May 10, 2011.

In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated August 12, 2010, which, upon a fact-finding hearing, determined that he neglected the subject children.

Lawrence N. Etah, Hempstead, N.Y., for appellant.

Christine Malafi, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Jeffrey P. Tavel of counsel), for respondent.

Arshia Basser, Central Islip, N.Y. attorney for the child.

Before: Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Lott and Austin, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence supports the Family Court's determination that the father neglected the subject children by engaging in certain acts of domestic violence against the mother in their presence that impaired, or created an imminent danger of impairing, their physical, emotional, or mental conditions ( see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Jordan E., 57 AD3d 539, 540; Matter of Andrew Y., 44 AD3d 1063, 1064; Matter of Zachery M., 306 AD2d 348, 349; cf. Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 367-372).


Summaries of

In re Suffolk County Child Protective Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2011
84 A.D.3d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Suffolk County Child Protective Services

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HANNAH A. SUFFOLK COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4045
921 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Santino T. (In re Nicholas M.)

In fact, on one of those occasions, the appellant permitted the child's mother to push the child in a…

In re Nicholas M.

In fact, on one of those occasions, the appellant permitted the child's mother to push the child in a…