From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Lafayette Co. v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-09077

Submitted May 9, 2003.

June 16, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated July 17, 2001, which granted a Petition for Administrative Review and revoked an order of the District Rent Administrator dated November 8, 2000, granting the petitioner's application for permission to eliminate the service of providing an outdoor swimming pool in the subject premises, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 8, 2002, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Kucker Bruh, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Patrick K. Munson and James R. Marino of counsel), for appellant.

Marcia P. Hirsch, New York, N.Y. (Michael B. Rosenblatt of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal could reasonably and rationally determine that the District Rent Administrator's decision to allow the petitioner to eliminate the swimming pool on its premises, a required service under the Rent Stabilization Code, was incorrect based upon the petitioner's failure to provide any evidence that pool usage had dropped, that the cost of operating the pool had increased substantially from that of prior years, or that there were any changes in circumstances making continuation of the pool unfeasible (see Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] §§ 2520.6[r], 2522.4[d][3]; Matter of 1781 Riverside v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 287 A.D.2d 255; Matter of West Vil. Assocs. v. Division of Hous. Community Renewal, 277 A.D.2d 111; Matter of Powers Assocs. v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 229 A.D.2d 349; Matter of Parcel 242 Realty v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 215 A.D.2d 132).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State Lafayette Co. v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

State Lafayette Co. v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STATE LAFAYETTE CO., appellant, v. DIVISION OF HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 488

Citing Cases

Kohman v. Rochambeau Realty Dev. Corp.

Plaintiff argues, alternatively, that his use of the backyard is a "required service" ( see Rent…