From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stallings

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1987
356 S.E.2d 339 (N.C. 1987)

Opinion

No. 716PA85

Filed 2 June 1987

ON rehearing to review the decision of the Supreme Court previously rendered in this case, 318 N.C. 565, 350 S.E.2d 327 (1986), reversing a decision of the Court of Appeals, 77 N.C. App. 592, 335 S.E.2d 529 (1985). Rearguments heard in the Supreme Court on 13 May 1987.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by John H. Watters, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Susan K. Seahorn for the juvenile appellant.


On 6 January 1987, this Court allowed the petition of the juvenile, William Vance Stallings, for the rehearing of this case. On 23 April 1987, the State filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that rehearing had been improvidently allowed. Having thoroughly reviewed the very helpful new briefs filed on behalf of the juvenile and the State, we conclude that we neither overlooked nor misapprehended any material points of fact or law when we first considered this case. Therefore the State's motion to dismiss the rehearing in this case as improvidently granted is well founded. See Montgomery v. Blades, 223 N.C. 331, 26 S.E.2d 876 (1943); Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 68 [ 122 N.C. 67], 30 S.E. 312 (1898); Devereux v. Devereux, 81 N.C. 12 (1879).

Rehearing dismissed as improvidently allowed.


Summaries of

In re Stallings

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1987
356 S.E.2d 339 (N.C. 1987)
Case details for

In re Stallings

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF: WILLIAM VANCE STALLINGS, JUVENILE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1987

Citations

356 S.E.2d 339 (N.C. 1987)
356 S.E.2d 339

Citing Cases

State v. Russell

Assuming arguendo that if the pre-hearing photographic identification by the victim was suggestive, and we do…

In Matter of M.L.A.

The use of showup identifications are a permissible, and sometimes preferred, technique in juvenile…