Opinion
NO. 01-14-00839-CR
10-28-2014
IN RE JOHN JAMES SMITH, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, John James Smith, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus on October 14, 2014, seeking to compel the respondent, his former appointed appellate counsel, Tony Aninao, to file an affidavit in response to the trial court's August 4, 2014 order in his pending application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus, filed under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07. However, we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus directed at relator's former appellate counsel because the requested writ neither is against a judge nor is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004).
The underlying case is Ex Parte John James Smith, Cause No. 1234109-A, in the 184th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jan Krocker presiding. The respondent, Tony Aninao, was appointed as relator's counsel for his appeal of his first-degree felony aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon conviction for which we affirmed the judgment on May 30, 2013, and issued our mandate on August 9, 2013. See John James Smith v. The State of Texas, No. 01-11-01114-CR, 2013 WL 2388047, at *1, 6 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 30, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).