From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Saunders

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 28, 2016
136 A.3d 701 (D.C. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16–BS–318.

04-28-2016

In re Stephen J. SAUNDERS, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Stephen J. Saunders, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 28 day of April 2016,

ORDERED that the said Stephen J. Saunders is hereby disbarred by consent, effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent's disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.


Summaries of

In re Saunders

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 28, 2016
136 A.3d 701 (D.C. 2016)
Case details for

In re Saunders

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: STEPHEN J. SAUNDERS, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 442497

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Apr 28, 2016

Citations

136 A.3d 701 (D.C. 2016)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Hudgens

As construed by this Court in the case of Carroll v. CashMills, 125 S.C. 332; 118 S.E., 290, this proviso…

Firestone Tire Rubber Co. v. Cross

In the later case of Tucker v. Hudgens, 132 S.C. 378, 129 S.E. 77, the Supreme Court of South Carolina, again…