From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Royot

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 10, 2003
834 So. 2d 427 (La. 2003)

Opinion

No. 2002-OB-2623

January 10, 2003

IN RE: Royot, Nathalie; Marty, Veronique; Moguen, Celine; Jarry, Guillaume; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Permission to Take Bar Examination


Not considered. As to petitioners Nathalie Royot, Veronique Marty, and Celine Moguen, there has been no showing that their qualifications for admission have changed since this Court denied their prior applications. In the absence of such showing, this Court will not consider a new application from these petitioners. As to petitioner Guillaume Jarry, the application is premature, as there is no indication petitioner has applied for admission to the Committee on Bar Admissions. See Supreme Court Rule XVII.

JLW

PFC

CDK

BJJ

JPV

CDT

JTK


Summaries of

In re Royot

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 10, 2003
834 So. 2d 427 (La. 2003)
Case details for

In re Royot

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: NATHALIE ROYOT, VERONIQUE MARTY, CELINE MOGUEN, AND GUILLAUME JARRY

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jan 10, 2003

Citations

834 So. 2d 427 (La. 2003)

Citing Cases

Leclerc v. Webb

The Court therefore rejected his petition as premature. In re Royot, 834 So.2d 427 (La. 2003); Rec. doc. 1,…